logo
CanyamAI summaries for academic research
language
MobileMobile
  • Phone FeatureWeChat Mini Program
EnglishEnglish
noticeNotice
BlogBlog
delete
arrow
Return

Cues to deception

delete2003-01-01
delete1.9K
PRE
AI
B
Bella M. DePaulo
J
James J. Lindsay
B
Brian E. Malone
L
Laura Muhlenbruck
K
Kelly Charlton
H
Helen Cooper
DOI：10.1037//0033-2909.129.1.74delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Do people behave differently when they are lying compared with when they are telling the truth? The combined results of 1,338 estimates of 158 cues to deception are reported. Results show that in some ways, liars are less forthcoming than truth tellers, and they tell less compelling tales. They also make a more negative impression and are more tense. Their stories include fewer ordinary imperfections and unusual contents. However, many behaviors showed no discernible links, or only weak links, to deceit. Cues to deception were more pronounced when people were motivated to succeed, especially when the motivations were identity relevant rather than monetary or material. Cues to deception were also stronger when lies were about transgressions.
Keywords:
PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS EVALUATOR
SELF-PRESENTATION
NONVERBAL CUES
INTERPERSONAL DECEPTION
LIE DETECTION
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
ACTION IDENTIFICATION
COGNITIVE INTERVIEW
PUPILLARY RESPONSES
SOCIAL-INTERACTION

Journal

Psychological Bulletin cover
Psychological Bulletin
IF:
19.8
Papers:
2.2K
Citations:
6.0W

Organization

No organization information available