arrow
Return

Data mining prototyping knowledge graphs for design process insights

delete2024-01-17
delete0
delete
OA
AI
J
James Gopsill *
L
Lorenzo Giunta *
M
Mark Goudswaard
C
Chris Snider
B
Ben Hicks
DOI:10.1080/09544828.2024.2302746delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Advancements in prototyping knowledge capture have resulted in several graph-based schemas where nodes represent prototyping activities and individuals, and edges represent semantic relationships between prototypes (e.g. influence and involvement) defined by the design team. Their subsequent implementation in web-based applications has enabled the integration of both physical and virtual prototyping knowledge. The integration affords traceability, version control, and application of graph analysis to generate insights into the Engineering Design process and the schema validation studies reported in prior research have resulted in several open-access Prototyping Knowledge Graph datasets. This paper builds on prior research by contributing a data mining analysis of nine Prototyping Knowledge Graphs. The analysis followed the CRISP-DM process. The purpose was to elicit insights on prototyping behaviour within the design process. The results revealed nine findings. Five corroborated existing observations and four were new observations. In particular, data mining of the knowledge graphs showed sequence and type of knowledge generated from prototyping are unique to each design process. Also, the critical design path is dominated by physical prototypes.
Keywords:
Prototyping
hackathons
knowledge graphs
CRISP-DM
graph analysis

Journal

Journal of Computational Design and Engineering cover
Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
IF:
6.1
Papers:
405
Citations:
3.2K

Organization

U
university of bath
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 13
U
University of Bristol
Scholars:
3.1W
Papers: 3.0W
Citations: 5.3W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Array programming with NumPy
err2020-09-16
err0
errOAAI
errCharles R. Harris; K. Jarrod Millman; Stéfan J. van der Walt; Ralf Gommers; Pauli Virtanen; David Cournapeau; Eric Wieser; Julian Taylor; Sebastian Berg; Nathaniel J. Smith; Robert Kern; Matti Picus; Stephan Hoyer; Marten H. van Kerkwijk; Matthew Brett; Allan Haldane; Jaime Fernández del Río; Mark Wiebe; Pearu Peterson; Pierre Gérard-Marchant; Kevin Sheppard; Tyler Reddy; Warren Weckesser; Hameer Abbasi; Christoph Gohlke; Travis E. Oliphant
errShare
errSave
How should we prototype? Establishing the affordances of prototyping media and approaches
err
IF0
err2023-06-19
err0
PREAI
errChris Snider; Mark Goudswaard; Charlie Ranscombe; Chaunpeng Hao; James Gopsill; Ben Hicks
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Perspectives on Future Prototyping—Results from an Expert Discussion
err2016-01-01
err0
PREAI
errIsrael,Johann Habakuk; Bähr,Benjamin; Exner,Konrad
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
A Systematic Literature Review on Applying CRISP-DM Process Model
err2021-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errChristoph Schröer; Felix Kruse; Jorge Marx Gómez
errShare
errSave
researcher View more