.png){kind=icon}
Return
Data mining static code attributes to learn defect predictors
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TSE.2007.256941.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The value of using static code attributes to learn defect predictors has been widely debated. Prior work has explored issues like the merits of McCabes versus Halstead versus lines of code counts for generating defect predictors. We show here that such debates are irrelevant since how the attributes are used to build predictors is much more important than which particular attributes are used. Also, contrary to prior pessimism, we show that such defect predictors are demonstrably useful and, on the data studied here, yield predictors with a mean probability of detection of 71 percent and mean false alarms rates of 25 percent. These predictors would be useful for prioritizing a resource-bound exploration of code that has yet to be inspected.
Keywords:
data mining detect prediction
McCabe
Halstead
artifical intelligence
empirical
naive Bayes
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
5.6
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
1.1W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSave
ShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveShareSaveEffects of Stefan Blowing and Slip Conditions on Unsteady MHD Casson Nanofluid Flow Over an Unsteady Shrinking Sheet: Dual Solutions.png)
Symmetry
OAAI
SymmetryIF0
OAAIShareSave
View more