arrow
Return

Deciphering Biosignatures in Planetary Contexts

delete2019-09-01
delete78
delete
OA
AI
M
Marjorie A. Chan *
N
Nancy W. Hinman
S
Sally L. Potter‐McIntyre
K
Keith E. Schubert
R
Richard J. Gillams
S
Stanley M. Awramik
P
Penelope J. Boston
D
D. M. Bower
D
David J. Des Marais
J
Jack D. Farmer
T
Tony Z. Jia
P
P. L. King
R
Robert M. Hazen
R
Richard Léveillé
D
Dominic Papineau
K
Kaitlin R. Rempfert
M
Mónica Sánchez‐Román
J
John R. Spear
G
Gordon Southam
J
J. C. Stern
H
Henderson James Cleaves
DOI:10.1089/ast.2018.1903delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Microbial life permeates Earth's critical zone and has likely inhabited nearly all our planet's surface and near subsurface since before the beginning of the sedimentary rock record. Given the vast time that Earth has been teeming with life, do astrobiologists truly understand what geological features untouched by biological processes would look like? In the search for extraterrestrial life in the Universe, it is critical to determine what constitutes a biosignature across multiple scales, and how this compares with abiosignatures formed by nonliving processes. Developing standards for abiotic and biotic characteristics would provide quantitative metrics for comparison across different data types and observational time frames. The evidence for life detection falls into three categories of biosignatures: (1) substances, such as elemental abundances, isotopes, molecules, allotropes, enantiomers, minerals, and their associated properties; (2) objects that are physical features such as mats, fossils including trace-fossils and microbialites (stromatolites), and concretions; and (3) patterns, such as physical three-dimensional or conceptual n-dimensional relationships of physical or chemical phenomena, including patterns of intermolecular abundances of organic homologues, and patterns of stable isotopic abundances between and within compounds. Five key challenges that warrant future exploration by the astrobiology community include the following: (1) examining phenomena at the right spatial scales because biosignatures may elude us if not examined with the appropriate instrumentation or modeling approach at that specific scale; (2) identifying the precise context across multiple spatial and temporal scales to understand how tangible biosignatures may or may not be preserved; (3) increasing capability to mine big data sets to reveal relationships, for example, how Earth's mineral diversity may have evolved in conjunction with life; (4) leveraging cyberinfrastructure for data management of biosignature types, characteristics, and classifications; and (5) using three-dimensional to n-D representations of biotic and abiotic models overlain on multiple overlapping spatial and temporal relationships to provide new insights.
Keywords:
Astrobiology
Biosignatures
Taphonomy
Extraterrestrial life
Extremophile
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Astrobiology cover
Astrobiology
IF:
2.6
Papers:
2.0K
Citations:
5.1K

Organization

U
University of Montana
Scholars:
2.6K
Papers: 2.1K
Citations: 1.0W
A
Arizona State University
Scholars:
2.7W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 4.2W
C
Carnegie Institution for Science
Scholars:
4.3K
Papers: 4.9K
Citations: 1.0W
B
Baylor University
Scholars:
6.3K
Papers: 5.4K
Citations: 5.2K
U
university of southampton
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 52
U
University of Utah
Scholars:
3.0W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 4.6W
A
Australian National University
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 3.9W
I
Institute of Science Tokyo
Scholars:
3.2W
Papers: 2.7W
Citations: 117
N
national aeronautics & space administration (nasa)
Scholars:
3.1W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 46
U
University of California Santa Barbara
Scholars:
1.2W
Papers: 9.6K
Citations: 3.6W
T
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 9.0K
Citations: 1.9W
U
university of montana system
Scholars:
3.6K
Papers: 3.2K
Citations: 7
University System of Maryland cover
University System of Maryland
Scholars:
6.4W
Papers: 5.6W
Citations: 113
U
Utah System of Higher Education
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 161
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.5W
Papers: 33.7W
Citations: 6.6K
Southern Illinois University System cover
Southern Illinois University System
Scholars:
6.0K
Papers: 5.0K
Citations: 55
A
arizona state university-tempe
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 13
N
nasa ames research center
Scholars:
3.5K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 8
researcher View more organizations