arrow
Return

Decision Support Frameworks and Tools for Conservation

delete2017-06-23
delete160
delete
OA
AI
M
Mark W. Schwartz *
C
Carly N. Cook
R
Robert L. Pressey
A
Andrew S. Pullin
M
Michael C. Runge
N
Nick Salafsky
W
William J. Sutherland
M
Matthew A. Williamson
DOI:10.1111/conl.12385delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The practice of conservation occurs within complex socioecological systems fraught with challenges that require transparent, defensible, and often socially engaged project planning and management. Planning and decision support frameworks are designed to help conservation practitioners increase planning rigor, project accountability, stakeholder participation, transparency in decisions, and learning. We describe and contrast five common frameworks within the context of six fundamental questions (why, who, what, where, when, how) at each of three planning stages of adaptive management (project scoping, operational planning, learning). We demonstrate that decision support frameworks provide varied and extensive tools for conservation planning and management. However, using any framework in isolation risks diminishing potential benefits since no one framework covers the full spectrum of potential conservation planning and decision challenges. We describe two case studies that have effectively deployed tools from across conservation frameworks to improve conservation actions and outcomes. Attention to the critical questions for conservation project planning should allow practitioners to operate within any framework and adapt tools to suit their specific management context. We call on conservation researchers and practitioners to regularly use decision support tools as standard practice for framing both practice and research.
Keywords:
Adaptive management
planning
decision analysis
evidence based
futures research
structured decision making
systematic conservation planning
project management
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Conservation Letters cover
Conservation Letters
IF:
5.9
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
6.6K

Organization

M
Monash University
Scholars:
5.4W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 79
B
Bangor University
Scholars:
4.5K
Papers: 4.6K
Citations: 7.6K
U
university of california davis
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 45
U
United States Department of the Interior
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 226
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
J
James Cook University
Scholars:
7.8K
Papers: 7.9K
Citations: 1.2W
United States Geological Survey cover
United States Geological Survey
Scholars:
9.3K
Papers: 7.5K
Citations: 1.8W
researcher View more organizations