.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Defensive Desert
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/papa.70013.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
When aiming to justify the infliction of harm upon a culpable wrongdoer, the notion of desert most readily finds its home within the context of punishment. Thus, according to one dominant theory of punishment, retributivism, a wrongdoer deserves the hard treatment constitutive of punishment. In this paper, I argue that desert can play a role in helping justify certain types of defensive action. Specifically, I aim to show how desert-based reasons can help justify seemingly futile defensive efforts. Importantly, this justification does not stem from the idea that the victim of an attack may draw against punishment in seeking to avert a threat, but rather from the belief that culpable aggressors deserve to be resisted.
Keywords:
defensive retributivism
desert
necessity
rights forfeiture
self-defense
the success condition
Journal
P
IF:
2.1
Papers:
17
Citations:
0