arrow
Return

Detecting Moderator Effects Using Subgroup Analyses

delete2011-05-12
delete131
delete
OA
AI
R
Rui Wang *
J
James H. Ware
DOI:10.1007/s11121-011-0221-xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
In the analysis of prevention and intervention studies, it is often important to investigate whether treatment effects vary among subgroups of patients defined by individual characteristics. These subgroup analyses can provide information about how best to use a new prevention or intervention program. However, subgroup analyses can be misleading if they test data-driven hypotheses, employ inappropriate statistical methods, or fail to account for multiple testing. These problems have led to a general suspicion of findings from subgroup analyses. This article discusses sound methods for conducting subgroup analyses to detect moderators. Multiple authors have argued that, to assess whether a treatment effect varies across subgroups defined by patient characteristics, analyses should be based on tests for interaction rather than treatment comparisons within the subgroups. We discuss the concept of heterogeneity and its dependence on the metric used to describe treatment effects. We discuss issues of multiple comparisons related to subgroup analyses and the importance of considering multiplicity in the interpretation of results. We also discuss the types of questions that would lead to subgroup analyses and how different scientific goals may affect the study at the design stage. Finally, we discuss subgroup analyses based on post-baseline factors and the complexity associated with this type of subgroup analysis.
Keywords:
Moderator
Subgroup analysis
Heterogeneity
Interaction
Subset
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Prevention Science cover
Prevention Science
IF:
2.7
Papers:
2.0K
Citations:
5.9K

Organization

H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.5W
Papers: 22.0W
Citations: 28.7W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

On the Speed of Muller’s Ratchet
err2000-12-01
err0
errOAAI
errIsabel Gordo; Brian Charlesworth
errShare
errSave
Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of As-Cast High-Entropy Alloys
errJOM
IF0
err2015-08-26
err0
PREAI
errMohsen Seifi; Dongyue Li; Zhang Yong; Peter K. Liaw; John J. Lewandowski
errShare
errSave
Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of colorectal cancer
err2006-02-16
err847
errOAAI
errWactawski-Wende, J; Kotchen, JM; Anderson, GL; Assaf, AR; Brunner, RL; O'Sullivan, MJ; Margolis, KL; Ockene, JK; Phillips, L; Pottern, L; Prentice, RL; Robbins, J; Rohan, TE; Sarto, GE; Sharma, S; Stefanick, ML; Van Horn, L; Wallace, RB; Whitlock, E; Bassford, T; Beresford, SAA; Black, HR; Bonds, DE; Brzyski, RG; Caan, B; Chlebowski, RT; Cochrane, B; Garland, C; Gass, M; Hays, J; Heiss, G; Hendrix, SL; Howard, BV; Hsia, J; Hubbell, FA; Jackson, RD; Johnson, KC; Judd, H; Kooperberg, CL; Kuller, LH; LaCroix, AZ; Lane, DS; Langer, RD; Lasser, NL; Lewis, CE; Limacher, MC; Manson, JE
errShare
errSave
How and why criteria defining moderators and mediators differ between the Baron & Kenny and MacArthur approaches
err2008-01-01
err637
errOAAI
errKraemer, Helena Chmura; Kiernan, Michaela; Essex, Marilyn; Kupfer, David J.
errShare
errSave
Structure of Carbon Dioxide Exchange Processes Above a Spruce Forest
err2004-01-01
err0
PREAI
errB. Wichura; J. Ruppert; A. C. Delany; N. Buchmann; T. Foken
errShare
errSave
Odds Ratios for Mediation Analysis for a Dichotomous Outcome
err2010-10-29
err693
errOAAI
errVanderWeele, Tyler J.; Vansteelandt, Stijn
errShare
errSave
researcher View more