arrow
Return

Developer recommendation on bug commenting: a ranking approach for the developer crowd

delete2017-04-26
delete15
PRE
AI
J
Jifeng Xuan *
H
He Jiang *
张宏玉 (Hongyu Zhang)
Z
Zhilei Ren
DOI:10.1007/s11432-015-0582-8delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
A bug tracking system provides a collaborative platform for the developer crowd. After a bug report is submitted, developers can make comments to supplement the details of the bug report. Due to the large number of developers and bug reports, it is hard to determine which developer (also called commenter) is able to comment on a particular bug report. We refer to the problem of recommending developers for commenting on bug reports as commenter recommendation. In this paper, we perform an empirical analysis on commenter recommendation based on five-year bug reports of four open source projects. First, we preliminarily analyze bug comments and commenters in three categories, the relationship between commenters and fixers, the data scale of comments, and the collaboration on bug commenting. Second, we design a recommendation approach via ranking developers in the crowd to reduce the manual effort of identifying commenters. In this approach, we formulize the commenter recommendation problem as a multi-label recommendation task and leverage both developer collaboration and bug content to find out appropriate commenters. Experimental results show that our approach can effectively recommend commenters; 41% to 75% of the recall value is achieved for top-10 recommendation. Our empirical analysis on bug commenting can help developers understand and improve the process of fixing bugs.
Keywords:
developer recommendation
bug comments
empirical analysis
recommendation for the crowd
collaborative filtering
software repositories
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Science China Information Sciences cover
Science China Information Sciences
IF:
7.6
Papers:
4.9K
Citations:
8.9K

Organization

M
Microsoft Research Asia
Scholars:
421
Papers: 407
Citations: 2
D
Dalian University of Technology
Scholars:
5.9W
Papers: 4.4W
Citations: 5.5W
W
wuhan university
Scholars:
8.1W
Papers: 5.8W
Citations: 70
researcher View more organizations