arrow
Return

Developing spatially comparable biodiversity indicators using objective scale-dependent species selection

delete2025-03-01
delete0
delete
OA
AI
E
Enya O’Reilly *
R
Richard D. Gregory
M
Marc Anton
B
Brotons, Lluis
V
Virginia Escandell
A
Anna Gamero
S
Sergi Herrando
F
Frédéric Jiguet
J
Johannes Kamp
A
Alena Klvaňová
P
Primož Kmecl
I
Ingar Jostein Øien
J
Jean‐Yves Paquet
J
Jiří Reif
B
Bård G. Stokke
N
Nicolas Strebel
N
Norbert Teufelbauer
S
Sven Trautmann
T
Thomas Vikstrøm
P
Petr Voříšek
S
Simon J. Butler
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113327delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Multi-species indices (MSIs) are an important tool for monitoring progress towards conservation policy targets from the local to the global scale. The choice of constituent species for habitat-specific indicators often reflects context-specific knowledge, policy needs and data availability. This makes direct comparisons of equivalent indicators across various locations challenging, and potentially reduces their representativeness if subsequently applied to other locations or spatial scales. In recognition of this, there is growing demand to develop standardised approaches to species selection that produce more spatially comparable MSIs. Using forest bird species in Europe, we use an objective, niche-based framework for indicator species selection to derive standardised indices at national, regional and pan-European scales, and explore the implications for species composition on indicator trends when adopting three alternative species-selection strategies: selecting species representative of a given spatial scale (geographically-targeted), disaggregating a species set representative of a broad-scale for use at smaller scales (top-down) and aggregating species lists representative of smaller scales for use at larger scales (bottom-up). We show that although the composition of indicator sets varied according to the species' selection approach, resultant index trends for a given location were generally comparable. However, geographicallytargeted indicators tended to be comprised of more specialist species and were more representative of the wider community. Whilst existing biodiversity indices provide critical insights into the state of nature across spatial scales, our study provides the basis for the development of complementary, standardised indicators that are spatially comparable.
Keywords:
Biodiversity indicators
European birds
Forest
Niche-based approach
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Ecological Indicators cover
Ecological Indicators
IF:
7.4
Papers:
1.3W
Citations:
7.1W

Organization

B
birdlife osterreich
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
C
catalan ornithol inst ico
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
B
birdlife denmark
Scholars:
2
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
P
Palacky Univ
Scholars:
175
Papers: 82
Citations: 20
C
CREAF
Scholars:
127
Papers: 95
Citations: 15
C
csic
Scholars:
3.8K
Papers: 1.7K
Citations: 471
C
czech soc ornithol
Scholars:
4
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
Univ East Anglia
Scholars:
300
Papers: 212
Citations: 77
D
dopps birdlife slovenia
Scholars:
2
Papers: 2
Citations: 0
Swiss Ornithological Institute cover
Swiss Ornithological Institute
Scholars:
436
Papers: 361
Citations: 621
N
Norwegian Institute Nature Research
Scholars:
1.3K
Papers: 1.3K
Citations: 27
J
joint nat conservat comm
Scholars:
5
Papers: 4
Citations: 23
N
natagora
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
C
cnrs sorbonne univ
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
D
dachverband deutsch avifaunisten ev dda
Scholars:
2
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
R
rspb ctr conservat sci
Scholars:
6
Papers: 4
Citations: 2
B
birdlife norway
Scholars:
9
Papers: 9
Citations: 1
S
seo birdlife
Scholars:
7
Papers: 6
Citations: 1
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

On the Myths of Indicator Species: Issues and Further Consideration in the Use of Static Concepts for Ecological Applications
err2013-10-16
err0
errOAAI
errMichael L. Zettler; C. Edward Proffitt; Alexander Darr; Steven Degraer; Lisa Devriese; Clare Greathead; Jonne Kotta; Paolo Magni; Georg Martin; Henning Reiss; Jeroen Speybroeck; Davide Tagliapietra; Gert Van Hoey; Tom Ysebaert
errShare
errSave
A Niche-Based Framework to Assess Current Monitoring of European Forest Birds and Guide Indicator Species' Selection
err2014-05-12
err0
errOAAI
errAmy S. I. Wade; Boris Barov; Ian J. Burfield; Richard D. Gregory; Ken Norris; Petr Vorisek; Taoyang Wu; Simon J. Butler
errShare
errSave
A state-of-the-art review on birds as indicators of biodiversity: Advances, challenges, and future directions
err2020-11-01
err107
errOAAI
errFraixedas, Sara; Linden, Andreas; Piha, Markus; Cabeza, Mar; Gregory, Richard; Lehikoinen, Aleksi
errShare
errSave
Exploring spatial indicators for biodiversity accounting
err2016-11-01
err14
PREAI
errRemme, Roy P.; Hein, Lars; van Swaay, Chris A. M.
errShare
errSave
Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss
err2018-09-14
err316
errOAAI
errMace, Georgina M.; Barrett, Mike; Burgess, Neil D.; Cornell, Sarah E.; Freeman, Robin; Grooten, Monique; Purvis, Andy
errShare
errSave
A proposed framework for developing indicators of ecosystem health
err1993-07-01
err0
PREAI
errJohn Cairns; Paul V. McCormick; B. R. Niederlehner
errShare
errSave
researcher View more