arrow
Return

Development of a Skin-Directed Scoring System for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Epidermal Necrolysis: A Delphi Consensus Exercise

delete2023-07-01
delete4
delete
OA
AI
M
Margo Waters
A
Allison S. Dobry
S
Stephanie T. Le
K
Kanade Shinkai
T
Thomas M. Beachkofsky
M
Mark D.P. Davis
A
Arturo R. Domínguez
D
Daniela Kroshinsky
A
Alina Markova
R
Robert G. Micheletti
A
Arash Mostaghimi
H
Helena B. Pasieka
M
Misha Rosenbach
L
Lucia Seminario‐Vidal
J
John Trinidad
J
Joerg Albrecht
E
Emily Altman
R
Ryan Arakaki
M
Michael R. Ardern‐Jones
A
Alina G. Bridges
A
Adela R. Cardones
A
Angad Chadha
J
Jennifer K. Chen
S
Steven T. Chen
K
Kyle Cheng
S
Steven Daveluy
K
Katherine L. DeNiro
J
Joanna Harp
J
Jesse J. Keller
B
Brett King
A
Abraham M. Korman
E
Eve J. Lowenstein
E
Erin Luxenberg
J
Jennifer Mancuso
M
Melissa Mauskar
P
Philip Milam
K
Kiran Motaparthi
C
Caroline A. Nelson
C
Cuong V. Nguyen
F
Fnu Nutan
A
Alex G. Ortega‐Loayza
T
Tejesh Patel
S
Sahand Rahnama‐Moghadam
S
Sergey Rekhtman
N
Nathan W. Rojek
M
Mansi Sarihan
S
Sheila Shaigany
T
Timmie R. Sharma
S
Sabrina M Shearer
B
Bridget E. Shields
L
Lindsay C. Strowd
D
Danielle Tartar
C
Cristina Thomas
K
Karolyn A. Wanat
A
Andrew F. Walls
L
Lisa C. Zaba
C
Carolyn Ziemer
E
Emanual Maverakis
B
Benjamin H. Kaffenberger *
DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1347delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
ImportanceScoring systems for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and epidermal necrolysis (EN) only estimate patient prognosis and are weighted toward comorbidities and systemic features; morphologic terminology for EN lesions is inconsistent. ObjectivesTo establish consensus among expert dermatologists on EN terminology, morphologic progression, and most-affected sites, and to build a framework for developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN. Evidence ReviewA Delphi consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria was initiated with a core group from the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists to establish agreement on the optimal design for an EN cutaneous scoring instrument, terminology, morphologic traits, and sites of involvement. FindingsIn round 1, the 54 participating dermatology hospitalists reached consensus on all 49 statements (30 appropriate, 3 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). In round 2, they agreed on another 15 statements (8 appropriate, 7 uncertain). There was consistent agreement on the need for a skin-specific instrument; on the most-often affected skin sites (head and neck, chest, upper back, ocular mucosa, oral mucosa); and that blanching erythema, dusky erythema, targetoid erythema, vesicles/bullae, desquamation, and erosions comprise the morphologic traits of EN and can be consistently differentiated. Conclusions and RelevanceThis consensus exercise confirmed the need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, nomenclature, and differentiation of specific morphologic traits, and identified the sites most affected. It also established a baseline consensus for a standardized EN instrument with consistent terminology. Key PointsQuestionIs there a need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, consistent EN terminology, a better understanding of orphologic progression, and/or identification of the most-affected sites? FindingsThis Delphi consensus exercise determined that there is a need for a skin-directed scoring system for EN with consensus achieved regarding terminology, morphologic traits, and most-affected locations of involvement. MeaningThe findings of this consensus exercise may be used as a framework for developing a skin-directed EN grading tool with the goal of precisely monitoring disease severity and changes during hospitalization. This Delphi consensus exercise with more than 50 dermatology experts explores the need for a skin-directed epidermal necrolysis assessment tool that incorporates disease morphologic traits, terminology, and sites of involvement.

Journal

J
JAMA Dermatology
IF:
11
Papers:
4.3K
Citations:
1.1W

Organization

U
M
Massachusetts General Hospital
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 8.6W
U
University System of Ohio
Scholars:
15.2W
Papers: 12.9W
Citations: 200
State University System of Florida cover
State University System of Florida
Scholars:
12.6W
Papers: 10.8W
Citations: 130
D
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Scholars:
8.5K
Papers: 6.7K
Citations: 15
U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
U
university of southampton
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 52
H
Harvard University
Scholars:
26.2W
Papers: 21.9W
Citations: 28.7W
Y
Yale University
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 6.0W
Citations: 10.0W
U
University of Washington
Scholars:
8.0W
Papers: 7.0W
Citations: 12.5W
S
Stanford University
Scholars:
9.6W
Papers: 8.2W
Citations: 17.0W
U
university of pennsylvania
Scholars:
9.2W
Papers: 7.8W
Citations: 153
U
university of california davis
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 2.6W
Citations: 45
U
university of south florida
Scholars:
1.5W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 9
U
university of california los angeles
Scholars:
5.3W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 89
M
mayo clinic
Scholars:
8.1W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 85
U
university of chicago
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 80
M
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Scholars:
2.9K
Papers: 2.2K
Citations: 2
U
university of new mexico's health sciences center
Scholars:
2.1K
Papers: 1.2K
Citations: 0
N
Northwell Health
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 9.6K
Citations: 5.1K
V
veterans health administration (vha)
Scholars:
2.6W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 40
U
university of texas system
Scholars:
18.3W
Papers: 15.5W
Citations: 210
W
Weill Cornell Medicine
Scholars:
2.1W
Papers: 1.5W
Citations: 1.4W
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.2W
Papers: 33.6W
Citations: 6.6K
U
university of new mexico
Scholars:
1.6W
Papers: 1.3W
Citations: 25
O
Ohio State University
Scholars:
4.0W
Papers: 3.2W
Citations: 80
W
wayne state university
Scholars:
2.0W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 17
O
Oregon Health & Science University
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 39
J
James A. Haley Veterans Hospital
Scholars:
222
Papers: 170
Citations: 613
M
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Scholars:
3.4W
Papers: 2.4W
Citations: 4.6W
H
Harvard Medical School
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 4.8W
Citations: 91
C
Cornell University
Scholars:
6.3W
Papers: 5.4W
Citations: 10.9W
researcher View more organizations