.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Diagnostic Ability of the Japanese Version of the High Bleeding Risk Criteria in Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
M
S
O
Y
O
T
S
U
S
I
K
K
DOI：10.1253/circj.CJ-25-0808.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Background: The Japanese version of the high bleeding risk (J-HBR) criteria was proposed to identify Japanese patients at HBR after percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the diagnostic ability of the J-HBR in patients with lower extremity peripheral Methods and Results: This multicenter registry included 818 LEAD patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). Based on J-HBR major (1 point) and minor (0.5 points) criteria, patients were grouped into LEAD with (>= 2.0 points) and without (1.0-1.5 points) additional J-HBR. LEAD itself is a major criterion. The primary endpoint was major bleeding events and major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACLE), a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, and major amputation. Of the 818 patients in the study, 683 (83.5%) had LEAD with additional J-HBR. During the median follow-up period of 729 days, the risk of major bleeding events did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, although the risk of MACLE was higher in the LEAD with than without additional J-HBR group (12.4% vs. 5.9%; P=0.03). The probability of major bleeding and MACLE increased progressively with an increase in the number of J-HBR major and minor criteria. Conclusions: Among patients with LEAD undergoing EVT, the J-HBR criteria successfully stratified ischemic and bleeding risks. This risk-predicting model may be useful in patients with LEAD.
Keywords:
High bleeding risk
Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease
Outcome
Journal
C
IF:
3.7
Papers:
8.3K
Citations:
1.0W
Organization
Cited Papers