.png){kind=icon}
Return
Diagnostics for asset pricing models
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/fima.12436.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
AbstractThe validity of asset pricing models implies white‐noise pricing errors (PEs). However, we find that the PEs of six well‐known factor models all exhibit a significant reversal pattern and are predictable by their lagged values up to 12 months. Moreover, the predictability of the PEs can produce substantial economic profits. Similar conclusions hold for recently developed machine learning models too. Additional analysis reveals that the significant PE profits cannot be explained by common behavioral biases. Our results imply that much remains to be done and there is a great need to develop new asset pricing models.
Journal
No journal information available
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
No cited papers available