Return
Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods
DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001.png)
Abstract
En 中文
In this article, we consider identification, estimation, and inference procedures for treatment effect parameters using Difference-in-Differences (DiD) with (i) multiple time periods, (ii) variation in treatment timing, and (iii) when the parallel trends assumption holds potentially only after conditioning on observed covariates. We show that a family of causal effect parameters are identified in staggered DiD setups, even if differences in observed characteristics create non-parallel outcome dynamics between groups. Our identification results allow one to use outcome regression, inverse prob-ability weighting, or doubly-robust estimands. We also propose different aggregation schemes that can be used to highlight treatment effect heterogeneity across different dimensions as well as to summarize the overall effect of participating in the treatment. We establish the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators and prove the validity of a computationally convenient bootstrap procedure to conduct asymptotically valid simultaneous (instead of pointwise) inference. Finally, we illustrate the relevance of our proposed tools by analyzing the effect of the minimum wage on teen employment from 2001-2007. Open-source software is available for implementing the proposed methods. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Difference-in-Differences
Dynamic treatment effects
Doubly robust
Event study
Variation in treatment timing
Treatment effect heterogeneity
Semi-parametric
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
4
Papers:
5.2K
Citations:
3.0W
Organization
Cited Papers
Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania: Comment
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
IF11.6
The effect of court-ordered hiring quotas on the composition and quality of police
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW
IF11.6

