arrow
Return

Direct assessment of microcirculation in shock: a randomized-controlled multicenter study

delete2023-06-06
delete31
delete
OA
AI
R
Raphael Romano Bruno
J
Jakob Wollborn
K
Karl Fengler
M
Moritz Flick
C
Christian Jung *
S
Sebastian Allgäuer
H
Hölger Thiele
M
Mara Schemmelmann
J
Johanna Hornemann
H
Helene Mathilde Emilie Moecke
F
Filiz Demirtas
L
Lina Palici
M
Marcus Franz
B
Bernd Saugel
E
Eduardo Kattan
D
Daniel De Backer
J
Jan Bakker
G
Glenn Hernández
M
Malte Kelm
J
Jung, Christian
DOI:10.1007/s00134-023-07098-5delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Purpose: Shock is a life-threatening condition characterized by substantial alterations in the microcirculation. This study tests the hypothesis that considering sublingual microcirculatory perfusion variables in the therapeutic management reduces 30-day mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with shock. Methods: This randomized, prospective clinical multicenter trial-recruited patients with an arterial lactate value above two mmol/L, requiring vasopressors despite adequate fluid resuscitation, regardless of the cause of shock. All patients received sequential sublingual measurements using a sidestream-dark field (SDF) video microscope at admission to the intensive care unit (+/- 4 h) and 24 (+/- 4) hours later that was performed blindly to the treatment team. Patients were randomized to usual routine or to integrating sublingual microcirculatory perfusion variables in the therapy plan. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, secondary endpoints were length of stay on the ICU and the hospital, and 6-months mortality. Results: Overall, we included 141 patients with cardiogenic (n = 77), post cardiac surgery (n = 27), or septic shock (n = 22). 69 patients were randomized to the intervention and 72 to routine care. No serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred. In the interventional group, significantly more patients received an adjustment (increase or decrease) in vasoactive drugs or fluids (66.7% vs. 41.8%, p = 0.009) within the next hour. Microcirculatory values 24 h after admission and 30-day mortality did not differ [crude: 32 (47.1%) patients versus 25 (34.7%), relative risk (RR) 1.39 (0.91-1.97); Cox-regression: hazard ratio (HR) 1.54 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-2.66, p = 0.118)]. Conclusion: Integrating sublingual microcirculatory perfusion variables in the therapy plan resulted in treatment changes that do not improve survival at all.
Keywords:
Microcirculation
Shock
Intensive care
Sidestream-dark field video microscope
Intravital microscopy
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Intensive Care Medicine cover
Intensive Care Medicine
IF:
21.2
Papers:
1.2W
Citations:
3.0W

Organization

No organization information available