.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
DisasterTD: Disaster Toponym Disambiguation Using Multimodal LLMs and Cross-View Geolocalization
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
W
Z
N
W
D
H
DOI：10.1109/tgrs.2026.3717084.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Social media imagery (SMI) provides timely and fine-grained ground perspectives that are valuable for situational awareness and emergency response. Unlike satellite or aerial imagery, SMI can capture disaster impacts and ground-level conditions in a timely manner. However, geographic references in SMI are often vague or ambiguous, making accurate geolocalization challenging. To address this issue, we propose Disaster TD, a disaster toponym disambiguation framework that integrates multimodal large language models (MLLMs)-based semantic reasoning with cross-view geolocalization. First, MLLMs extract toponyms and generate candidate geolocations from noisy textual inputs. Then, cross-view matching between SMI, remote sensing imagery (RSI), and optionally street-view imagery (SVI) is used to verify and refine these candidate results. A Vision Transformer (ViT)-based visual foundation model, DINOv2, is used to bridge the domain gap between overhead and ground-level imagery. We evaluate DisasterTD on the Hurricane Harvey dataset, where SMI is augmented with collected RSI and SVI to construct a cross-view benchmark for disaster geolocalization. The dataset is divided into four categories based on toponym clarity and ambiguity, allowing a fine-grained performance analysis across scenarios. Results show that DisasterTD consistently outperforms MLLM-only and cross-view-only baselines without disambiguation, achieving geolocalization accuracies of 71.62% within 1000 m, 62.36% within 500 m, 57.99% within 250 m, 52.09% within 100 m, and 47.01% within 50 m, while reducing the mean and median errors to 11.33 and 0.68 km, respectively. The largest improvements appear in ambiguous toponyms, where semantic reasoning with cross-view evidence reduces candidate dispersion and errors. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating MLLM-based candidate generation with cross-view verification for fine-grained disaster geolocalization.
Keywords:
Cross-view
disaster response
geolocalization
multimodal LLM
toponym disambiguation
Journal
IF:
8.6
Papers:
2.1W
Citations:
10.7W
Organization
Cited Papers