.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Distributed-memory lattice H-matrix factorization
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/1094342019861139.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We parallelize the LU factorization of a hierarchical low-rank matrix (H-matrix) on a distributed-memory computer. This is much more difficult than the H-matrix-vector multiplication due to the dataflow of the factorization, and it is much harder than the parallelization of a dense matrix factorization due to the irregular hierarchical block structure of the matrix. Block low-rank (BLR) format gets rid of the hierarchy and simplifies the parallelization, often increasing concurrency. However, this comes at a price of losing the near-linear complexity of the H-matrix factorization. In this work, we propose to factorize the matrix using a lattice H-matrix format that generalizes the BLR format by storing each of the blocks (both diagonals and off-diagonals) in the H-matrix format. These blocks stored in the H-matrix format are referred to as lattices. Thus, this lattice format aims to combine the parallel scalability of BLR factorization with the near-linear complexity of H-matrix factorization. We first compare factorization performances using the H-matrix, BLR, and lattice H-matrix formats under various conditions on a shared-memory computer. Our performance results show that the lattice format has storage and computational complexities similar to those of the H-matrix format, and hence a much lower cost of factorization than BLR. We then compare the BLR and lattice H-matrix factorization on distributed-memory computers. Our performance results demonstrate that compared with BLR, the lattice format with the lower cost of factorization may lead to faster factorization on the distributed-memory computer.
Keywords:
boundary element method
LU factorization
distributed memory
hierarchical matrix
task programming
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
2.5
Papers:
1.1K
Citations:
1.3K
View more organizations