arrow
Return

Diversity in Resource Use Strategies Promotes Productivity in Young Planted Tree Species Mixtures

delete2025-09-26
delete0
delete
OA
AI
J
Joel Jensen *
H
Haben Blondeel
J
Joannès Guillemot
F
Florian Schnabel
H
Hernán Serrano‐León
H
Harald Auge
L
Lander Baeten
N
Nadia Barsoum
J
Jürgen Bauhus
C
Christel Baum
R
Raimundo Bermúdez
F
Friderike Beyer
P
Pedro H. S. Brancalion
J
Jeannine Cavender‐Bares
N
Nico Eisenhauer
A
Adam Felton
O
Olga Ferlian
S
Sebastian Fiedler
T
Tobias Gebauer
D
Douglas L. Godbold
P
Peter Hajek
J
Jefferson S. Hall
D
Dirk Hölscher
H
Hervé Jactel
H
Holger Kreft
C
Cathleen Lapadat
C
Chloe MacLaren
N
Nicolas Martin‐StPaul
C
Céline Meredieu
S
Simone Mereu
C
Christian Messier
R
Rebecca Montgomery
B
Bart Muys
C
Charles A. Nock
J
John D. Parker
G
Gustavo B. Paterno
M
Michael P. Perring
Q
Quentin Ponette
C
Catherine Potvin
P
Peter B. Reich
J
James S. Rentch
B
Boris Rewald
A
Agnès Robin
S
Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael
H
Hans Sandén
K
Katherine Sinacore
R
Rachel J. Standish
A
Artur Stefański
K
Kris Verheyen
L
Laura Williams
M
Martin Weih
DOI:10.1111/gcb.70493delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Mixed-species forestry is a promising approach to enhance productivity, increase carbon sequestration, and mitigate climate change. Diverse forests, composed of species with varying structures and functional trait profiles, may have higher functional and structural diversity, which are attributes relevant to a number of mechanisms that can influence productivity. However, it remains unclear whether the context-dependent roles of functional identity, functional diversity, and structural diversity can lead to a generalized understanding of tree diversity effects on stand productivity. To address these gaps, we analyzed growth data from 83,600 trees from 89 species across 21 young tree diversity experiments spanning five continents and three biomes. Results revealed a positive saturating relationship between tree species richness and stand productivity, with reduced variability in growth rates among more diverse stands. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that functional diversity mediated the positive effects of species richness on productivity. We additionally report a negative relationship between structural diversity and productivity, which decreased with increasing species richness. When partitioning net diversity effects, we found that selection effects played a dominant role in driving the overall increase in productivity in these predominantly young stands, contributing 77% of the net diversity effect. Selection effects increased with diversity in wood density. Furthermore, acquisitive species with lower wood density and higher leaf nitrogen content had higher productivity in more diverse stands, while conservative species showed neutral to slightly negative responses to species mixing. Together, these results suggest that combining acquisitive with conservative species allows acquisitive species to drive positive selection effects while conservative species tolerate competition. Thus, contrasting resource-use strategies can enhance productivity to optimize mixed-species forestry, with potential for both ecological and economic benefits.
Keywords:
climate change mitigation
complementarity effects
forest management
functional traits
mixed-species forest plantations
selection effects
tree species richness
TreeDivNet
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Global Change Biology cover
Global Change Biology
IF:
12
Papers:
8.9K
Citations:
7.6W

Organization

E
environment centre wales
Scholars:
11
Papers: 12
Citations: 0
U
University of Rostock
Scholars:
9.5K
Papers: 7.6K
Citations: 11
G
Ghent University
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.5W
Citations: 5.5W
U
university of göttingen
Scholars:
900
Papers: 439
Citations: 0
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute cover
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Scholars:
1.2K
Papers: 944
Citations: 3.7K
I
inrae, biogeco, cestas, france
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
University of Bordeaux
Scholars:
517
Papers: 227
Citations: 0
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center cover
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Scholars:
460
Papers: 369
Citations: 1.6K
T
Technical University of Berlin
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 18
E
Earth and Life Institute
Scholars:
88
Papers: 42
Citations: 0
U
university of alberta
Scholars:
5.0W
Papers: 4.9W
Citations: 65
C
Centre for Forest Management
Scholars:
6
Papers: 3
Citations: 0
D
department forest
Scholars:
1
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
U
University of Minnesota
Scholars:
3.4K
Papers: 1.6K
Citations: 8.5W
S
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 1.2W
Citations: 2.1W
U
University of Freiburg
Scholars:
3.3W
Papers: 2.4W
Citations: 3.4W
C
cirad. umr eco&sols, montpellier, france
Scholars:
2
Papers: 1
Citations: 0
T
The University of Western Australia
Scholars:
873
Papers: 476
Citations: 4.2W
M
McGill University
Scholars:
5.5W
Papers: 4.9W
Citations: 7.0W
W
West Virginia University
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.0W
Citations: 1.2W
W
western sydney university
Scholars:
10.0K
Papers: 1.0W
Citations: 16
researcher View more organizations