.png){kind=icon}
Return
Do strategic groups differ in reputation?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:12<1195::AID-SMJ138>3.3.CO;2-I.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
While most strategic group research has focused on performance implications, we consider the relationship between strategic group membership and reputation. Using strategic group identity and domain consensus concepts, we propose strategic groups have different reputations. We find significant differences exist in reputation across three identified strategic groups of US. property/casualty insurers, supporting our contention that reputation is a multilevel concept. Post hoc analyses suggest strategic groups with higher reputation also have higher performance on some critical measures, indicating reputation may be a mobility barrier beneficial to members of certain groups. Practitioner implications include challenges of within-group differentiation in firm reputation. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords:
reputation
strategic group identity
domain consensus
mobility barriers
Journal
IF:
7.2
Papers:
3.4K
Citations:
4.6W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
No cited papers available