.png){kind=icon}
Return
Does the embedded atom model have predictive power?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.3367/UFNe.2020.01.038761.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Potassium, rubidium, aluminum, iron, nickel, and tin embedded atom models (EAMs) have been used as examples to ascertain how well the properties of a metal are described by EAM potentials calculated from the shape of shock adiabats and/or static compression data (from a function of cold pressure). Verification of the EAM potential implies an evaluation of its predictive power and an analysis of the agreement with experiment both at 0 or 298 K and under shock compression. To obtain consistent results, all contributions of collectivized electrons to energy and pressure need to be taken into consideration, especially in transition metals. Taking account of or ignoring electron contributions has little effect on the calculated melting lines of the models, self-diffusion coefficients, and viscosity. The shape of the melting line is sensitive to the behavior of the repulsive branch of the pair contribution to the EAM potential at small distances.
Keywords:
embedded atom model (EAM)
molecular dynamics method
embedding potential
electron contributions
predictive power
tandem
static compression
shock compression
Journal
P
IF:
3.4
Papers:
2.3K
Citations:
6.1K
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
Enzymes of the Last Steps of Chlorophyll Biosynthesis: Modification of the Substrate Structure Helps To Understand the Topology of the Active Centers.png)
Biochemistry
BiochemistryIF0
PREAI
ShareSaveA cobalt tungstate compound sensing electrode for hydrogen detection based upon mixed-potential type sensorsRSC Advances
OAAI
RSC AdvancesIF0
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveEffect of growth stage, cultivar, and root wounding on disease development in cotton caused by Fusarium wilt race 4 (Fusarium oxysporumf. sp.vasinfectum)Crop Science
Crop ScienceIF0
PREAI
ShareSave
View more