arrow
Return

Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimization

delete2014-11-01
delete165
delete
OA
AI
D
Dudik, Miroslav *
D
Dumitru Erhan
L
Langford, John
L
Li, Lihong
DOI:10.1214/14-STS500delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We study sequential decision making in environments where rewards are only partially observed, but can be modeled as a function of observed contexts and the chosen action by the decision maker. This setting, known as contextual bandits, encompasses a wide variety of applications such as health care, content recommendation and Internet advertising. A central task is evaluation of a new policy given historic data consisting of contexts, actions and received rewards. The key challenge is that the past data typically does not faithfully represent proportions of actions taken by a new policy. Previous approaches rely either on models of rewards or models of the past policy. The former are plagued by a large bias whereas the latter have a large variance. In this work, we leverage the strengths and overcome the weaknesses of the two approaches by applying the doubly robust estimation technique to the problems of policy evaluation and optimization. We prove that this approach yields accurate value estimates when we have either a good (but not necessarily consistent) model of rewards or a good (but not necessarily consistent) model of past policy. Extensive empirical comparison demonstrates that the doubly robust estimation uniformly improves over existing techniques, achieving both lower variance in value estimation and better policies. As such, we expect the doubly robust approach to become common practice in policy evaluation and optimization.
Keywords:
Contextual bandits
doubly robust estimators
causal inference
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Statistical Science cover
Statistical Science
IF:
3.4
Papers:
1.0K
Citations:
8.7K

Organization

A
alphabet inc.
Scholars:
1.1K
Papers: 663
Citations: 0
M
Microsoft
Scholars:
3.0K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 7
G
Google Incorporated
Scholars:
3.5K
Papers: 1.8K
Citations: 8
researcher View more organizations