arrow
Return

Dual-level clustering ensemble algorithm with three consensus strategies

delete2023-12-18
delete0
delete
OA
AI
Y
Yunxiao Shan
S
Shu Li *
F
Fuxiang Li *
Y
Yuxin Cui
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-49947-9delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Clustering ensemble (CE), renowned for its robust and potent consensus capability, has garnered significant attention from scholars in recent years and has achieved numerous noteworthy breakthroughs. Nevertheless, three key issues persist: (1) the majority of CE selection strategies rely on preset parameters or empirical knowledge as a premise, lacking adaptive selectivity; (2) the construction of co-association matrix is excessively one-sided; (3) the CE method lacks a more macro perspective to reconcile the conflicts among different consensus results. To address these aforementioned problems, a dual-level clustering ensemble algorithm with three consensus strategies is proposed. Firstly, a backward clustering ensemble selection framework is devised, and its built-in selection strategy can adaptively eliminate redundant members. Then, at the base clustering consensus level, taking into account the interplay between actual spatial location information and the co-occurrence frequency, two modified relation matrices are reconstructed, resulting in the development of two consensus methods with different modes. Additionally, at the CE consensus level with a broader perspective, an adjustable Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is developed as the third consensus method in present algorithm to dynamically fuse multiple ensemble results. Experimental results demonstrate that compared to seven other state-of-the-art and typical CE algorithms, the proposed algorithm exhibits exceptional consensus ability and robustness.
Keywords:
SELECTION
FRAMEWORK
FUSION
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Scientific Reports cover
Scientific Reports
IF:
3.9
Papers:
27.4W
Citations:
83.5W

Organization

No organization information available