arrow
Return

Dynamic error fields derivation by inverting a validated interpretative perturbations model

delete2023-08-16
delete1
delete
OA
AI
G
G. Miron *
F
F. Rimini
DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/acedc1delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
The need for a model able to provide the dynamic evolution of the intrinsic magnetic error fields amplitude in tokamaks is of a significant importance in order to develop strategies to correct its destabilizing effect. The present paper specifically aims to deliver this kind of model and adjacent code. A previously built direct perturbations interpretative model (Miron (JET Contributors) 2021 Nucl. Fusion 61 106016) is used to calculate the plasma instabilities amplitude and frequency aiming to match the same quantities provided by the device diagnostics data analysis specific code for various discharges at JET. The mentioned good match ensures our model validity against the experimental results. Based on its proven structural validity, our model considering the error field quantities is inverted. This time the initial direct model output results, namely the plasma perturbations amplitude and frequency, become input data for our inverse model aiming to solve the corresponding error field modes system of equations searched as unknowns. The error fields basically satisfy the same outer plasma perturbed equations as the plasma perturbations do (vacuum/wall/plasma column external structures). Obviously they do not satisfy the perturbed plasma equations. A clear and explicit dynamic error field solution is finally provided. It has been demonstrated that whenever the error fields are responsible for the mode locking effect and plasma rotation damping, the calculated error fields shows its expected disruptive resonant behavior during various discharges at JET.
Keywords:
tokamak
error field
modelling

Journal

Nuclear Fusion cover
Nuclear Fusion
IF:
4
Papers:
9.4K
Citations:
2.2W

Organization

C
Culham Science Centre
Scholars:
2.8K
Papers: 971
Citations: 790
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
errShare
errSave
Pd-Catalyzed Indolization/peri-C–H Annulation/N-Dealkylation Cascade to Cyclopenta-Fused Acenaphtho[1,2-b]indole Scaffold
err2021-12-01
err0
PREAI
errTienan Jin; Shin Suzuki; Hon Eong Ho; Hidenori Matsuyama; Masaki Kawata; Masahiro Terada
errShare
errSave
Braking due to non-resonant magnetic perturbations and comparison with neoclassical toroidal viscosity torque in EXTRAP T2R
err2015-10-07
err20
PREAI
errFrassinetti, L.; Sun, Y.; Fridstrom, R.; Menmuir, S.; Olofsson, K. E. J.; Brunsell, P. R.; Khan, M. W. M.; Liang, Y.; Drake, J. R.
errShare
errSave
Influence of externally applied magnetic perturbations on neoclassical tearing modes at ASDEX Upgrade
err2014-12-05
err26
errOAAI
errFietz, S.; Bergmann, A.; Classen, I.; Maraschek, M.; Garcia-Munoz, M.; Suttrop, W.; Zohm, H.
errShare
errSave
Childhood Trauma and Adult Somatic Symptoms
err2023-04-26
err0
errOAAI
errHanna Eilers; Marije aan het Rot; Bertus F. Jeronimus
errShare
errSave
Neuro-Ophthalmologic Response to Repetitive Subconcussive Head Impacts
err2020-04-01
err0
errOAAI
errMadeleine K. Nowak; Zachary W. Bevilacqua; Keisuke Ejima; Megan E. Huibregtse; Zhongxue Chen; Timothy D. Mickleborough; Sharlene D. Newman; Keisuke Kawata
errShare
errSave
Effect of resonant and non-resonant magnetic braking on error field tolerance in high beta plasmas
err2009-09-11
err79
PREAI
errReimerdes, H.; Garofalo, A. M.; Strait, E. J.; Buttery, R. J.; Chu, M. S.; In, Y.; Jackson, G. L.; La Haye, R. J.; Lanctot, M. J.; Liu, Y. Q.; Okabayashi, M.; Park, J. -K.; Schaffer, M. J.; Solomon, W. M.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more