arrow
Return

E-cigarettes versus combination nicotine replacement therapy following a recent failed quit attempt: a pragmatic randomized trial through state tobacco quitlines

delete2026-01-21
delete0
delete
OA
AI
T
Theodore L. Wagener *
A
Alice Hinton
T
Theodore M. Brasky
Y
Yoo Jin Cho
L
Laura A. Beebe
M
Michael S. Businelle
M
Matthew J. Carpenter
J
Jonathan Hart
K
Katrina A. Vickerman *
DOI:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101351delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background E-cigarettes have emerged as a potentially more effective and satisfying alternative to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) for smokers who struggle to quit. Although quitlines are effective platforms for tobacco cessation, they have not incorporated e-cigarettes due to regulatory concerns and limited clinical evidence. We evaluated whether quitline-delivered counseling combined with e-cigarettes was more effective than counseling with NRT among adults who recently failed to quit using standard quitline services. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with two U.S. state quitlines between October 2020 and January 2023. Adults [N = 350; 212 (61%) female & 248 (72%) white] who were still smoking after a recent quitline enrollment were randomised (1:1) to receive 8 weeks of either JUUL ecigarettes or a combination of nicotine patch and lozenge, along with three counseling calls. The primary outcome was biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence (7-day PPA) at 8 weeks. Analyses used an intent-to-treat approach; secondary outcomes included 12-week abstinence, prolonged abstinence, changes in smoking behavior, dependence, and adverse effects. Findings At 8 weeks, 7-day PPA did not differ significantly between e-cigarette and NRT groups [25 (14.3%) of 175 and 17 (9.7%) of 175, respectively; OR 1.56; 95% CI 0.80-3.04; p = 0.19]. Both groups showed similar reductions in cigarette use and dependence. Adherence to counseling and assigned products was high. Adverse events were generally mild; cough and breathing difficulties were more frequently reported in the e-cigarette group and NRT participants reported more dizziness, sleeplessness, and allergies. Interpretation Among quitline users with a recent failed quit attempt, e-cigarettes combined with quitline counseling were not more effective than combination NRT in increasing smoking abstinence after 8 weeks' follow-up. Funding U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Copyright (c) 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords:
Tobacco
Cessation
Cigarettes
Electronic cigarettes
Smoking abstinence
Quitlines
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

L
Lancet Regional Health-Americas
IF:
7.6
Papers:
43
Citations:
0

Organization

J
james cancer hospital & solove research institute
Scholars:
4.6K
Papers: 2.7K
Citations: 8
U
university of oklahoma health sciences center
Scholars:
161
Papers: 88
Citations: 0
O
ohio state university
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 734
Citations: 2
M
medical university of south carolina
Scholars:
2.0K
Papers: 771
Citations: 0
researcher View more organizations