.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Embodied carbon in building structural systems and envelopes: a systematic critical review of methodological comparability, design trade-offs, and early-stage decision support
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
R
DOI：10.1016/j.jobe.2026.117044.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
• A two-database systematic search yielded 100 included full-text studies. • Functional units, reference periods, uncertainty, and Module D were inconsistently reported. • Structural and envelope rankings depend on functional equivalence and regional scenarios. • Evidence was synthesized by direction and confidence because meta-analysis was inappropriate. • A staged framework links evidence quality, uncertainty, and early design decisions.
Keywords:
Embodied carbon
Whole-life carbon
Structural systems
Building envelopes
Life cycle assessment
Methodological comparability
Uncertainty
Early-stage design
Journal
IF:
7.4
Papers:
1.6W
Citations:
6.6W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers