.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Emergency Department Interfacility Transfers Requiring Critical Procedures are Increasing: A United States Nationwide Analysis
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
A
E
A
C
M
N
N
DOI：10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.12.020.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Background: Given the changing landscape of healthcare since the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitals have reduced or limited services, leading to increased inter-facility transfers. Appropriate management by emergency medical services (EMS) requires specialized training and resources, particularly for critically ill patients status post critical procedures. Objectives: This study aimed to quantify and trend the number of interfacility transfers involving critical procedures from United States (US) emergency departments (EDs) from 2018 to 2022. Methods: The study is a retrospective cross-sectional study using the 2018-2022 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) datasets. Adult patient encounters ( >= 18 years old) transferred from EDs to other short-term hospitals were included. Critical procedures performed in the ED were identified using procedure codes for tracheal intubation, noninvasive ventilation, blood transfusion, central line insertion, chest tube insertion, arterial line insertion, transcutaneous pacing, and transvenous pacing. Counts and estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were weighted to account for the complex survey design. Results: During the study period, an estimated 9867701 (95% CI 9475559-10259843) adult patients were transferred from US EDs. Among those transferred, 655442 (6.6%, 95% CI 6.4-6.9) had at least 1 critical procedure. Time in years was associated with any critical procedure, with an odds ratio of 1.09 (95% CI 1.07-1.11). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, the estimate remained unchanged, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.09 (1.07-1.11). The association was significantly positive for all critical procedures, except for transcutaneous and transvenous pacing. Conclusions: The rising number of interfacility transfers involving critical procedures underscores the need for enhanced EMS resources and training. This trend highlights the growing demands on EMS systems to manage complex patient needs during transfers. (c) 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Keywords:
Critical illness
emergency medical services
emergency service
hospital
hospitals
interfacility transfer
Journal
J
IF:
1.3
Papers:
233
Citations:
0
Organization
Cited Papers