.png){kind=icon}
Return
Encapsulating architecture and encapsulating processes
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1017/S0140525X0230013X.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Thomas & Karmiloff-Smith (T&K-S) raise the excellent mid, in retrospect, obvious point that in a dynamic learning environment where feedback is possible, we should expect networks to adapt to damage by altering details of their behavior. We should therefore not expect that developmental disorders should result in normal modules. The implications of, this point go much further, since interprocess dependency in the brain does not rely only on learned neural connections. This argues strongly against behavioral and process-related definitions, as opposed to structural and architecture-related definitions, of mental modularity.
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
13.7
Papers:
1.6W
Citations:
1.2W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
No cited papers available