arrow
Return

Enhancing Self-Supervised Learning through Explainable Artificial Intelligence Mechanisms: A Computational Analysis

delete2024-06-03
delete1
delete
OA
AI
E
Elie Neghawi *
Y
Yan Liu
DOI:10.3390/bdcc8060058delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Self-supervised learning continues to drive advancements in machine learning. However, the absence of unified computational processes for benchmarking and evaluation remains a challenge. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art self-supervised learning algorithms, emphasizing their underlying mechanisms and computational intricacies. Building upon this analysis, we introduce a unified model-agnostic computation (UMAC) process, tailored to complement modern self-supervised learning algorithms. UMAC serves as a model-agnostic and global explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methodology that is capable of systematically integrating and enhancing state-of-the-art algorithms. Through UMAC, we identify key computational mechanisms and craft a unified framework for self-supervised learning evaluation. Leveraging UMAC, we integrate an XAI methodology to enhance transparency and interpretability. Our systematic approach yields a 17.12% increase in improvement in training time complexity and a 13.1% boost in improvement in testing time complexity. Notably, improvements are observed in augmentation, encoder architecture, and auxiliary components within the network classifier. These findings underscore the importance of structured computational processes in enhancing model efficiency and fortifying algorithmic transparency in self-supervised learning, paving the way for more interpretable and efficient AI models.
Keywords:
deep learning
explainable artificial intelligence
convolutional neural networks (CNNs)
self-supervised machine learning

Journal

B
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
IF:
4.4
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
2.4K

Organization

C
concordia university - canada
Scholars:
8.0K
Papers: 8.9K
Citations: 4