.png){kind=icon}
Return
Enteroscopes
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.032.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the related articles feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized but, in many cases, data from randomized controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the governing board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through April 2007 for articles related to endoscopy in patients with enteroscopy by using the keywords enteroscopy, enteroscope, overtube, intra-operative, double-balloon, and 'Push pull paired with endoscopy, small intestine, and small bowel. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or Payment for such treatment.
Keywords:
DOUBLE-BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY
WIRELESS CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY
SMALL-BOWEL ENTEROSCOPY
PUSH-ENTEROSCOPY
DIAGNOSTIC YIELD
INTRAOPERATIVE ENTEROSCOPY
PULL ENTEROSCOPY
THERAPEUTIC IMPACT
CLINICAL-OUTCOMES
POSTOPERATIVE RECURRENCE
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
7.5
Papers:
2.7W
Citations:
2.4W
Organization
No organization information available
Cited Papers
Clinical Impact of Push Enteroscopy in Patients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding of Unknown Origin
OAAI
OAAIShareSaveShareSaveDiagnostic yield and effect on clinical outcomes of push enteroscopy in suspected small-bowel bleeding.png)
ENDOSCOPY
ENDOSCOPYIF12.8
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSaveDiagnostic yield of routine push enteroscopy with a graded-stiffness enteroscope without overtube
PREAI
ShareSaveShareSave
View more