arrow
Return

Environmental variability can select for optimism or pessimism

delete2010-11-11
delete38
PRE
AI
J
John M. McNamara *
P
Pete C. Trimmer
A
Anders Eriksson
J
James A. R. Marshall
A
Alasdair I. Houston
DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01556.xdelete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
P>We propose operational definitions of reproductive optimism and pessimism; optimism involves behaving in a way that gives too much weight (in terms of producing surviving offspring) to positive events, pessimism gives too much weight to negative events. Natural selection maximizes the long-term growth of a lineage rather than short-term measures such as numbers of offspring. Consequently, optimism or pessimism can be favoured by natural selection, even though such biases appear irrational from a short-term perspective. We investigate the evolution of optimism in a metapopulation. The circumstances of a patch change over time, independently of other patches. With sufficient dispersal between patches, stochasticity affects members of a lineage largely independently and optimism is favoured. With little dispersal, the temporal fluctuations of a patch affect many members similarly; pessimism is then favoured. Our results establish that the spatial and temporal structure of the environment is crucial in determining the direction of evolved biases.
Keywords:
Metapopulation
natural selection
optimism
rationality
spatial variation
stochasticity
temporal variation
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Ecology Letters cover
Ecology Letters
IF:
7.9
Papers:
4.4K
Citations:
4.0W

Organization

U
university of gothenburg
Scholars:
2.6W
Papers: 2.3W
Citations: 33
U
University of Bristol
Scholars:
3.1W
Papers: 3.0W
Citations: 5.3W