Eudaimonism Without Virtue

doi:10.1017/S0031819125101228

Eudaimonism Without Virtue

2026-01-01

0

PRE

AI

M

Moore, Joseph *

DOI：10.1017/S0031819125101228

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

Eudaimonist virtue ethicists from Aristotle to contemporary Neo-Aristotelians have held (1) that human flourishing (eudaimonia) is the ultimate ethically justifying end of action and (2) that human flourishing consists in the exercise of virtues of character. This paper has two goals. First, I argue for separating these two commitments and distinguishing eudaimonism in general from its common virtue-ethical interpretation. To do so, I clarify the justificatory structure of eudaimonism. Second, I object to the conjunction of these two views, eudaimonism and the character virtue conception of flourishing. On the eudaimonist assumption that flourishing is the sole ultimate justificatory end of ethical action, whatever flourishing consists in must be a plausible ultimate end that does not require further justification. But character-virtuous activity is not a plausible ultimate end. The moral and prudential activities that exercise character virtues like justice, courage, and moderation characteristically aim to produce or distribute instrumental benefits which must serve, and be justified by, other ends in turn.

Keywords:

Eudaimonism

Virtue ethics

Human flourishing

Ethical justification

Character virtues

Eudaimonism Without Virtue

Abstract

Journal

Organization

Cited Papers