arrow
Return

Evaluating and optimizing stabilizing dining philosophers

delete2017-11-01
delete1
PRE
AI
J
Jordan Adamek
G
Giovanni Farina
S
Sébastien Tixeuil
DOI:10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.05.003delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
We study theoretical and practical aspects of five of the most well-known self-stabilizing dining philosophers algorithms. We theoretically prove that three of them are incorrect. For practical evaluation, we simulate these five algorithms as well as two classic non-self-stabilizing algorithms and evaluate their fault-tolerance, latency and throughput of critical section access. We present a new combined algorithm that achieves the best throughput of the two remaining correct self-stabilizing algorithms by determining the system load and switching between these basic algorithms. We prove the combined algorithm correct simulate it and study its performance characteristics. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Self-stabilization
Dining philosophers
Simulation
Distributed algorithms
Fault tolerance
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing cover
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
IF:
4
Papers:
3.8K
Citations:
4.8K

Organization

K
Kent State University
Scholars:
2.7K
Papers: 2.3K
Citations: 6.6K
U
University System of Ohio
Scholars:
15.5W
Papers: 13.0W
Citations: 200
K
kent state university kent
Scholars:
1.2K
Papers: 1.0K
Citations: 1
researcher View more organizations
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

errShare
errSave
Effect of xenobiotics on microrna expression in rat liver
err2016-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errL.F. Gulyaeva; M.D. Chanyshev; S.K. Kolmykov; D.S. Ushakov; S.S. Nechkin
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave