Evaluating emerging issues in epidemiology

James J. Collins

doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.04.002

Return

Evaluating emerging issues in epidemiology

2007-08-01

PRE

Mariette Boerstoel-Streefland

J. Michael Sprafka

Amy Lavin Williams

Michael P. Holsapple *

DOI：10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.04.002

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

Industry and government institutions need a credible approach for evaluating and responding to emerging public health issues. Representatives of industry, government, and academia met under the auspices of the International Life Sciences Institute's Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) to develop successful strategies for dealing with emerging issues based on historical case studies. The case studies chosen for evaluation were (1) tampon use and toxic shock syndrome; (2) hazardous waste and childhood cancer risk in Toms River, New Jersey; (3) fenfluramine and phentermine use and valvular heart disease; (4) silicone breast implants and cancer and auto-immune disease; and (5) progestational drugs and birth defects. We identified eight lessons from these case studies. Foremost, we recommend that public and private institutions not defer action until an issue is scientifically resolved and stress that cooperation among issue stakeholders is critical for effective issue resolution. We suggest establishing a research program as an effective way to assure that good science is included in resolution of the issue. We further recommend frequent and timely communication with all stakeholders, and the development of research approaches to fill gaps when the scientific data on an issue are limited. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:

causality

epidemiology

evidence

policy

risk assessment

risk communication

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.