.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Evaluating Large Language Models for Material Selection
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1115/1.4066730.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Material selection is a crucial step in conceptual design due to its significant impact on the functionality, aesthetics, manufacturability, and sustainability impact of the final product. This study investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) for material selection in the product design process and compares the performance of LLMs against expert choices for various design scenarios. By collecting a dataset of expert material preferences, the study provides a basis for evaluating how well LLMs can align with expert recommendations through prompt engineering and hyperparameter tuning. The divergence between LLM and expert recommendations is measured across different model configurations, prompt strategies, and temperature settings. This approach allows for a detailed analysis of factors influencing the LLMs' effectiveness in recommending materials. The results from this study highlight two failure modes: the low variance of recommendations across different design scenarios and the tendency toward overestimating material appropriateness. Parallel prompting is identified as a useful prompt-engineering method when using LLMs for material selection. The findings further suggest that, while LLMs can provide valuable assistance, their recommendations often vary significantly from those of human experts. This discrepancy underscores the need for further research into how LLMs can be better tailored to replicate expert decision-making in material selection. This work contributes to the growing body of knowledge on how LLMs can be integrated into the design process, offering insights into their current limitations and potential for future improvements.
Keywords:
material selection
large language models
context-aware design assistance
artificial intelligence
data-driven engineering
machine learning for engineering applications
Journal
IF:
3.3
Papers:
111
Citations:
2.2K