arrow
Return

Evaluating Response Shift in Statistical Mediation Analysis

delete2021-05-13
delete7
delete
OA
AI
A
A. R. Georgeson *
M
Matthew J. Valente
O
Oscar González
DOI:10.1177/25152459211012271delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Researchers and prevention scientists often develop interventions to target intermediate variables (known as mediators) that are thought to be related to an outcome. When researchers target a mediating construct measured by self-report, the meaning of the self-report measure could change from pretest to posttest for the individuals who received the intervention-which is a phenomenon referred to as response shift. As a result, any observed changes on the mediator measure across groups or across time might reflect a combination of true change on the construct and response shift. Although previous studies have focused on identifying the source and type of response shift in measures after an intervention, there has been limited research on how using sum scores in the presence of response shift affects the estimation of mediated effects via statistical mediation analysis, which is critical for explaining how the intervention worked. In this article, we focus on recalibration response shift, which is a change in internal standards of measurement and affects how respondents interpret the response scale. We provide background on the theory of response shift and the methodology used to detect response shift (i.e., tests of measurement invariance). In addition, we used simulated data sets to provide an illustration of how recalibration in the mediator can bias estimates of the mediated effect and affect Type I error and power.
Keywords:
response shift
statistical mediation
measurement invariance
randomized intervention
pretest-posttest design
open materials
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

A
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
IF:
13.4
Papers:
322
Citations:
3.7K

Organization

U
university of north carolina
Scholars:
7.4W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 93
U
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Scholars:
3.9W
Papers: 3.1W
Citations: 46
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations
err2017-12-05
err46
PREAI
errSajobi, Tolulope T.; Brahmbatt, Ronak; Lix, Lisa M.; Zumbo, Bruno D.; Sawatzky, Richard
errShare
errSave
Measurement invariance of alcohol use motivations in junior military personnel at risk for depression or anxiety
err2010-05-01
err26
PREAI
errWilliams, Jason; Jones, Sarah B.; Pemberton, Michael R.; Bray, Robert M.; Brown, Janice M.; Vandermaas-Peeler, Russ
errShare
errSave
Cross-national evidences of a school-based universal programme for promoting prosocial behaviours in peer interactions: Main theoretical communalities and local unicity
err2019-06-24
err29
PREAI
errLuengo Kanacri, Bernadette P.; Zuffiano, Antonio; Pastorelli, Concetta; Jimenez-Moya, Gloria; Tirado, Liliana U.; Thartori, Eriona; Gerbino, Maria; Cumsille, Patricio; Martinez, Maria L.
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
researcher View more