.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Evaluation of Drying Times in Natural Fiber-Based Mycelium Composites from Empty Fruit Bunches and Kenaf
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
H
H
K
F
A
B
F
DOI：10.3390/fib14010007.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Empty fruit bunches (EFBs) and kenaf are two abundant sources of lignocellulosic resource agricultural waste with potential as substrates for mycelium-based composites (MBCs). These composites are lightweight, compostable, low-cost, and suitable for packaging applications. However, their performance is highly dependent on the type of lignocellulosic substrate and the processing conditions applied during production. Despite the promising availability of natural fibers, limited research has focused on the drying process that affects the quality of MBCs. This study investigates the effect of different drying times (12, 18, and 24 h) on the physical and mechanical properties of MBCS produced from EFB and kenaf substrates. Following a 20-day incubation period under controlled conditions, the composites were oven-dried and analyzed for mycelial colonization, density measurement, shrinkage, water loss, shore A hardness, impact resistance, and mold growth. The results demonstrated that a drying time of 24 h yielded the best overall performance. Moisture loss (67.00%) and shrinkage (50.70%) increased with longer drying times (24 h), particularly in kenaf-based composites. Extended drying minimized mold contamination and enhanced the structural integrity of the composites. Overall, EFB-based composites achieved the highest Shore A hardness (44.53 HA). These findings show that optimizing the drying time enhances the durability of MBCs, reinforcing their potential as sustainable, biodegradable alternatives to polystyrene and promoting the development of eco-friendly materials.
Keywords:
mycelium-based composites
drying time
kenaf and EFB composites
sustainable packaging materials
biodegradable alternatives to polystyrene
Journal
IF:
3.9
Papers:
810
Citations:
2.8K
Organization
Cited Papers