arrow
Return

Evidence-based campaigning

delete2018-10-01
delete0
delete
OA
AI
B
Brian Martin *
DOI:10.1186/s13690-018-0302-4delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Background: When promoting public health measures, such as reducing smoking, there are many different approaches, for example providing information, imposing legal restrictions, taxing products, and changing cultures. By analogy with evidence-based medicine, different approaches to campaigning for health promotion can be compared by obtaining evidence of effectiveness. However, evaluating the effectiveness of campaigning approaches is far more difficult than evaluating drugs or medical procedures, because controls are seldom possible, endpoints are difficult to specify, multiple factors influence outcomes, and the targets of campaigns are people or organizations that may resist. Methods: Ten ideal campaigning types are proposed: positive and negative approaches to the five categories of information, attitude, arguments, authorities and incentives. To illustrate the ideal types and the complexities of evaluating approaches to campaigning, three contrasting Australian strategies to promote vaccination are examined. Results: Each of the three vaccination-promotion strategies showed the presence of several ideal campaigning types, but with distinct differences in emphasis. With available evidence, it is difficult to assess the relative effectiveness of the three strategies. Conclusion: Because of the difficulty in obtaining evidence, claims about the effectiveness of general approaches to health promotion should be treated with scepticism, especially when presented by partisans. There are inherent difficulties in making campaigning evidence-based.
Keywords:
Evidence-based medicine
Health promotion
Campaigning
Vaccination
Australia
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Archives of Public Health cover
Archives of Public Health
IF:
3.2
Papers:
1.8K
Citations:
4.4K

Organization

U
University of Wollongong
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 2.8W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Reproducibility and Validity of an Epidemiologic Questionnaire to Assess Past Year Physical Activity in Adolescents
err1995-07-15
err0
PREAI
errDeborah J. Aaron; Andrea M. Kriska; Stephen R. Dearwater; Jane A. Cauley; Kenneth F. Metz; Ronald E. LaPorte
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
Acrylamide formation during frying of potatoes: thorough investigation on the influence of crop and process variables
err2004-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errT. De Wilde; B. De Meulenaer; F. Mestdagh; R. Verhé; Y. Govaert; S. Fraselle; J. M Degroodt; S. Vandeburie; K. Demeulemeester; A. Calus; W. Ooghe; C. Van Peteghem
errShare
errSave
ESSAY Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?
err2014-06-13
err1.1K
errOAAI
errGreenhalgh, Trisha; Howick, Jeremy; Maskrey, Neal
errShare
errSave
Trends and patterns in vaccination objection, Australia, 2002-2013
err2016-04-18
err82
errOAAI
errBeard, Frank H.; Hull, Brynley P.; Leask, Julie; Dey, Aditi; McIntyre, Peter B.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more