.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Expecting and Learning From Null Results
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.3102/0013189X19891440.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This commentary addresses three issues raised in the articles in this issue. First, conversations about replication efforts should begin with a reasonable and agreed-upon definition of what it means to say that a study did or did not replicate the results of another study. Second, if a replication failure has been identified, using the surface similarity of the studies to reverse-engineer an explanation is unlikely to be helpful. Finally, researchers and consumers should expect small and heterogeneous effects, and this fact points to the need to think meta-analytically.
Keywords:
complex interventions
meta-analysis
replication
systematic review
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.