.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Experiences using lightweight formal methods for requirements modeling
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1109/32.663994.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This paper describes three case studies in the lightweight application of formal methods to requirements modeling for spacecraft fault protection systems. The case studies differ from previously reported applications of formal methods in that formal methods were applied very early in the requirements engineering process, to validate the evolving requirements. The results were fed back into the projects, to improve the informal specifications. For each case study, we describe what methods were applied, how they were applied, how much effort was involved, and what the findings were. In all three cases, formal methods enhanced the existing verification and validation processes, by testing key properties of the evolving requirements, and helping to identify weaknesses. We conclude that the benefits gained from early modeling of unstable requirements more than outweigh the effort needed to maintain multiple representations.
Keywords:
software requirements
formal methods
verification and validation
fault protection software
NASA
Journal
IF:
5.6
Papers:
2.8K
Citations:
1.1W
Organization
No organization information available