arrow
Return

Experiences using systematic review guidelines

delete2007-09-01
delete172
PRE
AI
M
Mark Staples *
M
Mahmood Niazi
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.046delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Systematic review is a method to identify, assess and analyse published primary studies to investigate research questions. We critique recently published guidelines for performing systematic reviews on software engineering, and comment on systematic review generally with respect to our experience conducting one. Overall we recommend the guidelines. We recommend researchers clearly and narrowly define research questions to reduce overall effort, and to improve selection and data extraction. We suggest that complementary research questions can help clarify the main questions and define selection criteria. We show our project timeline, and discuss possibilities for automating and increasing the acceptance of systematic review. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
systematic review
empirical software engineering
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Systems and Software cover
Journal of Systems and Software
IF:
4.1
Papers:
5.5K
Citations:
8.4K

Organization

No organization information available
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Does the John Bates Clark Medal Boost Subsequent Productivity and Citation Success?
err2013-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errHo Fai Chan; Bruno S. Frey; Jana Gallus; Benno Torgler
errShare
errSave
Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering
err2002-08-01
err889
errOAAI
errKitchenham, BA; Pfleeger, SL; Pickard, LM; Jones, PW; Hoaglin, DC; El Emam, K; Rosenberg, J
errShare
errSave
Improving software process improvement
err2002-07-01
err74
PREAI
errConradi, R; Fuggetta, A
errShare
errSave