.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Experiments in Daily Life: When Causal Within-Person Effects Do (Not) Translate Into Between-Person Differences
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
A
P
M
E
DOI：10.1037/met0000741.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Intensive longitudinal designs allow researchers to study the dynamics of psychological processes in daily life. Yet, because these methods are usually observational, they do not allow strong causal inferences. A promising solution is to incorporate (micro-)randomized interventions within intensive longitudinal designs to uncover within-person (Wp) causal effects. However, it remains unclear whether (or how) the resulting Wp causal effects translate into between-person (Bp) differences in outcomes. In this work, we show analytically and using simulated data that Wp causal effects translate into Bp differences if there are no counteracting forces that modulate this cross-level translation. Three possible counteracting forces that we consider here are (a) contextual effects, (b) correlated random effects, and (c) cross-level interactions. We illustrate these principles using empirical data from a 10-day microrandomized mindfulness intervention study (n = 91), in which participants were randomized to complete a treatment or control task at each occasion. We conclude by providing recommendations regarding the design of microrandomized experiments in intensive longitudinal designs, as well as the statistical analyses of data resulting from these designs.
Keywords:
ambulatory assessment
intensive longitudinal data
experiment
mindfulness
experience sampling
Journal
IF:
7.8
Papers:
1.3K
Citations:
2.1W
Organization
Cited Papers