arrow
Return

Expert Consensus on Pediatric Urodynamics Reporting Using Modified Delphi Technique

delete2024-07-01
delete2
PRE
AI
K
Kristen M. Meier *
C
Cláudia Mata
J
Jill L. Kaar
A
Adam J. Rensing
A
Anne G. Dudley
A
Alonso Carrasco
B
Beth A. Drzewiecki
B
Brian A. VanderBrink
C
Courtney S. Streur
D
Darius Bägli
D
David J. Chalmers
D
Duncan T. Wilcox
E
Elizabeth B. Yerkes
G
Glen A. Lau
G
Gino J. Vricella
S
Sarah L. Hecht
H
Hillary L. Copp
H
Hans G. Pohl
I
Israel Franco
J
Jennifer Ahn
J
John S. Wiener
J
Jennifer Singer
C
Christopher Long
M
Mélise Keays
M
Michael Daugherty
M
Molly E. Fuchs
P
Paul F. Austin
C
Charlotte Q. Wu
R
Rebecca Zee
R
Rosalia Misseri
S
Stacy T. Tanaka
S
Stuart B. Bauer
K
Kyle O. Rove
DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004000delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Purpose:Urodynamic testing (UDS) is an important tool in the management of pediatric lower urinary tract conditions. There have been notable efforts to standardize pediatric UDS nomenclature and technique, but no formal guidelines exist on essential elements to include in a clinical report. We sought to identify ideal structure and elements of a pediatric UDS assessment based on expert consensus.Materials and Methods:Pediatric urologists regularly performing UDS were queried using a Delphi process. Participants were invited representing varied geographic, experience, and societal involvement. Participants underwent 3 rounds of questionnaires between November 2022 and August 2023 focusing on report organization, elements, definitions, and automated electronic health record clinical decision support. Professional billing requirements were also considered. Consensus was defined as 80% agreeing either in favor of or against a topic. Elements without consensus were discussed in subsequent rounds.Results:A diverse sample of 30 providers, representing 27 institutions across 21 US states; Washington, District of Columbia; and Canada completed the study. Participants reported interpreting an average number of 5 UDS reports per week (range 1-22). The finalized consensus report identifies 93 elements that should be included in a pediatric UDS report based on applicable study conditions and findings.Conclusions:This consensus report details the key elements and structure agreed upon by an expert panel of pediatric urologists. Further standardization of documentation should aid collaboration and research for patients undergoing UDS. Based on this information, development of a standardized UDS report template using electronic health record implementation principles is underway, which will be openly available for pediatric urologists.
Keywords:
pediatric
urodynamics
standardization

Journal

Journal of Urology cover
Journal of Urology
IF:
6.8
Papers:
6.6W
Citations:
4.2W

Organization

C
children's national health system
Scholars:
5.7K
Papers: 4.3K
Citations: 4
D
Duke University
Scholars:
6.3W
Papers: 5.7W
Citations: 6.5W
University of Colorado System cover
University of Colorado System
Scholars:
6.3W
Papers: 5.5W
Citations: 1.8K
U
university of california san francisco
Scholars:
5.2W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 67
U
University of Utah
Scholars:
3.0W
Papers: 2.2W
Citations: 4.6W
Y
Yale University
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 6.0W
Citations: 10.0W
U
university of pennsylvania
Scholars:
9.2W
Papers: 7.8W
Citations: 153
H
hospital for sick children (sickkids)
Scholars:
1.1W
Papers: 8.1K
Citations: 16
C
children's hospitals & clinics of minnesota
Scholars:
737
Papers: 541
Citations: 1
U
university of colorado anschutz medical campus
Scholars:
2.3W
Papers: 1.8W
Citations: 22
U
university of california los angeles
Scholars:
5.3W
Papers: 4.2W
Citations: 89
M
Maine Medical Center
Scholars:
1.8K
Papers: 1.5K
Citations: 491
U
Utah System of Higher Education
Scholars:
4.6W
Papers: 4.0W
Citations: 161
University of California System cover
University of California System
Scholars:
37.5W
Papers: 33.7W
Citations: 6.6K
U
university of oklahoma system
Scholars:
1.9W
Papers: 1.6W
Citations: 17
O
Oregon Health & Science University
Scholars:
2.5W
Papers: 2.1W
Citations: 39
U
University of Michigan
Scholars:
6.4W
Papers: 5.3W
Citations: 124
P
pennsylvania medicine
Scholars:
1.3W
Papers: 9.9K
Citations: 12
U
university of michigan system
Scholars:
9.1W
Papers: 8.6W
Citations: 133
U
university of toronto
Scholars:
14.7W
Papers: 12.0W
Citations: 165
researcher View more organizations