arrow
Return

Explaining face representation in the primate brain using different computational models

delete2021-07-01
delete30
delete
OA
AI
常乐 cover
常乐 (Le Chang) *
B
Bernhard Egger
T
Thomas Vetter
D
Doris Y. Tsao *
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.014delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Understanding how the brain represents the identity of complex objects is a central challenge of visual neuroscience. The principles governing object processing have been extensively studied in the macaque face patch system, a sub-network of inferotemporal (IT) cortex specialized for face processing. A previous study reported that single face patch neurons encode axes of a generative model called the active appearancemodel, which transforms 50D feature vectors separately representing facial shape and facial texture into facial images. However, a systematic investigation comparing this model to other computational models, especially convolutional neural network models that have shown success in explaining neural responses in the ventral visual stream, has been lacking. Here, we recorded responses of cells in the most anterior face patch anterior medial (AM) to a large set of real face images and compared a large number of models for explaining neural responses. We found that the active appearance model better explained responses than any other model except CORnet-Z, a feedforward deep neural network trained on general object classification to classify non-face images, whose performance it tied on some face image sets and exceeded on others. Surprisingly, deep neural networks trained specifically on facial identification did not explain neural responses well. A major reason is that units in the network, unlike neurons, are less modulated by face related factors unrelated to facial identification, such as illumination.
Keywords:
DATABASE
RESPONSES
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Current Biology cover
Current Biology
IF:
7.5
Papers:
2.2W
Citations:
7.8W

Organization

C
California Institute of Technology
Scholars:
2.9W
Papers: 2.5W
Citations: 4.9W
H
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Scholars:
1.2W
Papers: 7.8K
Citations: 6.0W
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Are We Face Experts?
err2018-02-01
err162
errOAAI
errYoung, Andrew W.; Burton, A. Mike
errShare
errSave
Effect of water and stress on the lattice-preferred orientation of olivine
err2006-07-01
err0
PREAI
errH. Jung; I. Katayama; Z. Jiang; T. Hiraga; S. Karato
errShare
errSave
The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithms
err1998-04-01
err1.8K
PREAI
errPhillips, PJ; Wechsler, H; Huang, J; Rauss, PJ
errShare
errSave
PEMFC Reconfigured Anodes for Enhancing CO Tolerance with Air Bleed
err2004-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errFrancisco A. Uribe; Judith A. Valerio; Fernando H. Garzon; Thomas A. Zawodzinski
errShare
errSave
Which Psychosocial Factors Best Predict Cognitive Performance in Older Adults?
err2014-03-31
err0
errOAAI
errLaura B. Zahodne; Cindy J. Nowinski; Richard C. Gershon; Jennifer J. Manly
errShare
errSave
Brain Morphological Changes and Early Marijuana Use
err2010-02-02
err0
PREAI
errWilliam Wilson; Roy Mathew; Timothy Turkington; Thomas Hawk; R. Edward Coleman; James Provenzale
errShare
errSave
PriMa-X: A reference model for realizing prescriptive maintenance and assessing its maturity enhanced by machine learning
err2018-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errTanja Nemeth; Fazel Ansari; Wilfried Sihn; Bernhard Haslhofer; Alexander Schindler
errShare
errSave
errShare
errSave
researcher View more