arrow
Return

Exploring a spatial statistical approach to quantify flood risk perception using cognitive maps

delete2014-12-24
delete34
PRE
AI
E
Eoin O’Neill *
M
Michael Brennan
F
Finbarr Brereton
H
Harutyun Shahumyan
DOI:10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Modern flood risk management strategies have evolved from flood resistance to a holistic approach incorporating prevention, protection and preparedness with the aim of reducing the likelihood and/or impact of flooding. This evolution has been driven by a trend of increasingly damaging and frequent flood events due to climate change. Populations at risk are required to be an active participant within modern flood risk management plans, resulting in management plan effectiveness being partially dependent on the relevant population's flood risk perception. Thus, understanding how at-risk populations perceive their own flood risk, and how this compares to the reality of the situation, is a significant component of flood risk management. This paper compares subjective risk perception to an objective measure of risk within a specific case study area, where 305 residents were surveyed on their perception of flood risk. As part of the survey, respondents were asked to delineate the areas of the study area that they perceived would be at risk of inundation during a severe flood event. Using spatial statistical indicators, including Fuzzy Kappa comparison, it was possible to quantify the divergence between subjective and objective measures of risk extent, enabling an assessment of the 'correctness' of subjective perceived risk. This novel approach identified significant deviations between risk perception and objective risk measures at an individual level. The paper concludes by considering potential policy implications.
Keywords:
Risk perception
Flooding
Cognitive maps
Fuzzy Kappa
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Natural Hazards cover
Natural Hazards
IF:
3.7
Papers:
9.6K
Citations:
2.8W

Organization

T
Trinity College Dublin
Scholars:
2.4W
Papers: 1.9W
Citations: 2.7W
University System of Maryland cover
University System of Maryland
Scholars:
6.5W
Papers: 5.6W
Citations: 113
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Corrosion Resistance of Novel Coatings on Ferritic Steels for Oxycombustion–Supercritical Steam Boilers: Preliminary Results
err2015-07-23
err0
PREAI
errAlina Agüero; Ignacio Baraibar; Vanessa González; Raúl Muelas; Daniel Plana
errShare
errSave
Enhancing flood resilience through improved risk communications
err2012-07-20
err101
errOAAI
errO'Sullivan, J. J.; Bradford, R. A.; Bonaiuto, M.; De Dominicis, S.; Rotko, P.; Aaltonen, J.; Waylen, K.; Langan, S. J.
errShare
errSave
researcher View more