.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Exploring Teaching Methods for Construction Contract Law Using Analytic Hierarchy Process
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1061/jladah.ladr-1420.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
Construction law holds significant importance due to its inherent rationale and pervasive presence at every stage of the project in the construction sector. The average value of construction disputes worldwide was USD 42.8 million in 2021. Complying with construction law and regulations plays a pivotal role in the seamless functioning of the sector. That is why construction law skills are vital for engineers. They ensure regulatory compliance, facilitate effective contract management, foster improved communication among stakeholders, and enhance risk mitigation. The substantial and unique nature of this subject makes it challenging to condense into a traditional course format. Despite being structured as a course, effectively conveying the practical aspects of construction contract law to engineers requires a distinct pedagogical approach. The present pilot study aims to rank student preferences for different teaching methods in construction contract law education in India using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). This study contributes to the knowledge base by identifying preferred pedagogical approaches from the students' perspective. Out of nine teaching methods, the lecture method is the highest ranked by Indian students. This research seeks to enhance subject understanding and effectiveness of construction law courses in the country. This can benefit the construction sector by producing engineers who are better equipped to navigate legal complexities.
Keywords:
Construction law
Engineering education
Contract management
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Construction disputes
Journal
J
IF:
1.5
Papers:
120
Citations:
0
View more organizations