Enhancing long-term motion prediction for floating energy platforms: A physics-informed framework multi-scale recalibrated fusion transformer model

Yang Chen

doi:10.1016/j.energy.2026.140325

Exploring the Cohesiveness Bonus in Brainstorming, Brainwriting, and Nominal Groups

2026-03-01

0

PRE

AI

D

David Dryden Henningsen *

M

Miller Henningsen, Mary Lynn

J

Jessica Bozeman

D

DeBeck, Dennis

C

Chiasson, Rebekah

DOI：10.1080/1041794X.2026.2638815

Original

Original request for help

Save

Abstract

En 中文

Brainstorming groups enjoy a cohesiveness bonus over nominal groups. Brainstorming group members report a greater desire to work with their group in the future. This finding is further explored in the current study. Mutual enhancement and symbolic convergence provide possible explanations. In a competitive test, brainstorming groups were compared to brainwriting and nominal groups in 54 three-person groups (i.e. 18 groups per condition). By considering brainwriting groups, we compared groups with idea sharing to fully interacting brainstorming groups and non-interacting nominal groups. We found that brainstorming groups produce higher levels of piggybacking, symbolic convergence, and cohesiveness compared to nominal or brainwriting groups, favoring a symbolic-convergence explanation of the cohesiveness bonus.

Keywords:

Brainstorming

brainwriting

cohesiveness

mutual enhancement

symbolic convergence theory

Exploring the Cohesiveness Bonus in Brainstorming, Brainwriting, and Nominal Groups

Abstract

Journal

Organization