arrow
Return

Exposing tail biters by automatic scream detection

delete2024-12-01
delete0
delete
OA
AI
P
Philipp Heseker *
T
Tjard Bergmann
M
Marc-Alexander Lieboldt
I
Imke Traulsen
N
Nicole Kemper
J
Jeanette Probst
M
Marina Scheumann
DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100582delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Tail biting is a major problem in pig husbandry and early intervention is essential to maintain animal health and welfare. To facilitate early identification of tail biters a detector software was created that can detect scream-linked biting events through analyzing video and audio recordings. Undocked weaner pigs housing in different pens and batches were recorded for a duration of 39 days. Screamlinked tail biting events were firstly identified manually and then automatically through the developed detector by analyzing the audio track of the video recordings. The detector's performance was evaluated by testing different sensitivity parameters (e.g., loudness threshold, call duration, frequency range). In four pens (748 h), a total of 2,898 screams were manually detected, with 52.8 % caused by tail biting. In the second step, 89.9 % of the detected screams were classified correctly as screams by the detector (precision 0.81-1.00). From the detected screams, 64.0 % were caused by tail biting. The detector automatically analyzes the latest videos in user-defined periods and sends warning messages if a threshold of screams per hour is exceeded. Then, biters can be identified manually using the detector extracted incidence video clips. In conclusion, automatic analysis of pig screams has high potential as an early intervention tool by detecting tail biting events followed by evaluation of time synchronized video clips for biter identification.
Keywords:
Tail biting
Early detection
Intervention
Precision livestock farming
Audio analysis
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Smart Agricultural Technology cover
Smart Agricultural Technology
IF:
5.7
Papers:
2.6K
Citations:
2.5K

Organization

U
university of kiel
Scholars:
2.3W
Papers: 1.8W
Citations: 15
U
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover
Scholars:
3.4K
Papers: 2.3K
Citations: 2
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Deuterium solid‐state NMR study of the molecular mobility and dehydration of tert‐butyl alcohol on zeolite H‐ZSM‐5
err2005-04-12
err0
PREAI
errAlexander G. Stepanov; Alexander G. Maryasov; Vyacheslav N. Romannikov; Kirill I. Zamaraev
errShare
errSave
Online detection and localisation of piglet crushing using vocalisation analysis and context data
err2017-04-01
err15
PREAI
errManteuffel, Christian; Hartung, Eberhard; Schmidt, Mariana; Hoffmann, Gundula; Schoen, Peter Christian
errShare
errSave
Consumption estimates of walleye stocked as fry to suppress fathead minnow populations in west‐central Minnesota wetlands
err2007-07-04
err0
PREAI
errM. C. Ward; D. W. Willis; B. R. Herwig; S. R. Chipps; B. G. Parsons; J. R. Reed; M. A. Hanson
errShare
errSave
Why are most EU pigs tail docked? Economic and ethical analysis of four pig housing and management scenarios in the light of EU legislation and animal welfare outcomes
errANIMAL
IF4.2
err2016-01-01
err69
errOAAI
errD'Eath, R. B.; Niemi, J. K.; Ahmadi, B. Vosough; Rutherford, K. M. D.; Ison, S. H.; Turner, S. P.; Anker, H. T.; Jensen, T.; Busch, M. E.; Jensen, K. K.; Lawrence, A. B.; Sandoe, P.
errShare
errSave
Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking?
errANIMAL
IF4.2
err2014-01-01
err134
errOAAI
errD'Eath, R. B.; Arnott, G.; Turner, S. P.; Jensen, T.; Lahrmann, H. P.; Busch, M. E.; Niemi, J. K.; Lawrence, A. B.; Sandoe, P.
errShare
errSave
Automated tracking to measure behavioural changes in pigs for health and welfare monitoring
err2017-12-14
err116
errOAAI
errMatthews, Stephen G.; Miller, Amy L.; Plotz, Thomas; Kyriazakis, Ilias
errShare
errSave
researcher View more