.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Extracting Meaningful Issue–Solution Pair From Collaborative Developer Live Chats
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1109/TR.2025.3550412.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
The live chats of developers often contain meaningful information in the form of issue–solution pairs. The issue–solution pairs can offer helpful references to others who seek solutions for the similar issues, which can improve software development efficiency by facilitating issue solving. However, previous approaches such as ISPY still struggle with unsatisfactory extraction accuracy, due to the entanglement and complexity of issue-solution pairs' feature information. To address these challenges, we propose an approach named <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IS-Hunter</i> for mining issue-solution pairs from real-time chat data. Specifically, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">IS-Hunter</i> consists of four main components: the data preprocessing component disentangles and denoises raw chat logs, the utterance embedding component embeds utterances into vectors that subsequent components can easily process, the feature extraction component obtains textual, heuristic, and contextual feature that determines whether an utterance is topic-relevant, and the issue–solution pair prediction component predicts the utterance whether is an issue or a solution. The experimental results show that the performance of IS-Hunter outperforms the baseline methods in issue-detection and solution-extraction in terms of Precision, Recall, and F1-score. Compared with baseline methods, in issue-detection, IS-Hunter, respectively, achieves an average precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.74, 0.74, and 0.74, and it marks an obvious 4.23% improvement over the state-of-the-art approaches. Simultaneously, in solution-extraction, IS-Hunter achieves an average precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.83, 0.90, and 0.86 which is 4.88% higher than the best baseline methods.
Keywords:
Collaborative developer live chats
issue detection
open-source software community
solution extraction
Journal
IF:
5.7
Papers:
2.7K
Citations:
8.5K