arrow
Return

Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges

delete2025-02-06
delete0
delete
OA
AI
A
Alexander Todorov *
D
DongWon Oh
S
Stefan Uddenberg
D
Daniel N. Albohn
DOI:10.1111/nyas.15293delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Complex evaluative judgments from facial appearance are made efficiently and are consequential. We review some of the most important findings and methods over the last two decades of research on face evaluation. Such evaluative judgments emerge early in development and show a surprising consistency over time and across cultures. Judgments of trustworthiness, in particular, are closely associated with general valence evaluation of faces and are grounded in resemblance to emotional expressions, signaling approach versus avoidance behaviors. Data-driven computational models have been critical for the discovery of the configurations of features, including resemblance to emotional expressions, driving specific judgments. However, almost all models are based on judgments aggregated across individuals, essentially masking idiosyncratic differences in judgments. Yet, recent research shows that most of the meaningful variance of complex judgments such as trustworthiness is idiosyncratic: explained not by stimulus features, but by participants and participants by stimuli interactions. Hence, to understand complex judgments, we need to develop methods for building models of judgments of individual participants. We describe one such method, combining the strengths of well-established methods with recent developments in machine learning.
Keywords:
data-driven computational methods
face evaluation
judgment
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences cover
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
IF:
4.8
Papers:
2.5K
Citations:
4.4W

Organization

U
university of chicago
Scholars:
4.4W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 80
University of Illinois System cover
University of Illinois System
Scholars:
6.8W
Papers: 6.2W
Citations: 644
N
National University of Singapore
Scholars:
7.5W
Papers: 6.5W
Citations: 11.4W
researcher View more organizations