logo
CanyamAI summaries for academic research
language
MobileMobile
  • Phone FeatureWeChat Mini Program
EnglishEnglish
noticeNotice
BlogBlog
delete
arrow
Return

Failures without errors: quantification of context in HRA

delete2004-02-01
delete86
PRE
AI
Y
Yushi Fujita
E
Erik Hollnagel
DOI：10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.006delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
PSA-cum-human reliability analysis (HRA) has traditionally used individual human actions, hence individual 'human errors', as a meaningful unit of analysis. This is inconsistent with the current understanding of accidents, which points out that the notion of 'human error' is ill defined and that adverse events more often are the due to the working conditions than to people. Several HRA approaches, such as ATHEANA and CREAM have recognised this conflict and proposed ways to deal with it. This paper describes an improvement of the basic screening method in CREAM, whereby a rating of the performance conditions can be used to calculate a Mean Failure Rate directly without invoking the notion of human error. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
PSA
human reliability analysis
CREAM
contextual factors
prospective analysis
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

R
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
IF:
11
Papers:
9.0K
Citations:
4.2W

Organization

No organization information available