arrow
Return

Fairness-Aware Reverse Auction-Based Federated Learning

delete2024-01-01
delete0
PRE
AI
X
Xiaoli Tang *
H
Han Yu
DOI:10.1109/JIOT.2024.3504548delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Auction-based federated learning (AFL) has garnered significant research attention recently. However, existing methods for AFL data consumers (DCs) primarily focus on improving FL model performance by recruiting data owners (DOs) with high reputations and low ask prices, disregarding fair treatment for DOs. The challenge of striking a balance between performance and fairness when recruiting DOs remains unaddressed. To tackle this issue, we propose the Fairness-aware Reverse AFL for DCs (FAR-AFL). FAR-AFL leverages Lyapunov optimization to dynamically adjust selection probabilities for potential DOs, taking into account dynamic changes in participation rates and reputation. FAR-AFL adopts a reverse auction-based DO recruitment mechanism to determine candidate selection and pricing. By combining these components, FAR-AFL improves FL model accuracy while minimizing overall recruitment costs. Crucially, FAR-AFL ensures equitable DO treatment, providing them with fair participation opportunities. Theoretical analysis shows the computational efficiency, individual rationality, and truthfulness of FAR-AFL. Extensive experimental evaluation against six alternative strategies on four benchmark datasets demonstrates that FAR-AFL outperforms the best alternative strategy by 1.99%, 6.60%, 1.97%, and 23.31% in terms of test accuracy, root mean square error, cost reduction, and fairness improvement, respectively.
Keywords:
Costs
Training
Ecosystems
Data models
Recruitment
Federated learning
Computational modeling
Accuracy
Pricing
Optimization
Auction-based federated learning (AFL)
fairness
Lyapunov optimization

Journal

IEEE Internet of Things Journal cover
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
IF:
8.9
Papers:
1.4W
Citations:
7.8W

Organization

N
Nanyang Technological University
Scholars:
4.9W
Papers: 4.8W
Citations: 8.1W